What do you think science is? There is nothing magical about science. It is simply a systematic way for carefully and thoroughly observing nature and using consistent logic to evaluate results. So, which part of that exactly do you disagree with? Do you disagree with being thorough? Using careful observation? Being systematic? Or using consistent logic? … People are saying ‘we don’t need science.’ You don’t need to be logically consistent? You don’t need to be thorough? What is it about the science that you think we don’t need, or you don’t like, or isn’t valuable?
Steve Novella from Skeptics Guide to the Universe, episode 292, responding to an anti-scientific criticism